LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for SCIART-L Archives


SCIART-L Archives

SCIART-L Archives


January 2008


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

3-D models (1 message)
Advice on pricing for poster in South = Africa (2 messages)
Advice on pricing for poster in South Africa (10 messages)
Any scientific illustrators with PhD ... IN scientific illustration? (16 messages)
Better transfer methods (16 messages)
Blog use and inquire: Successful or not? (14 messages)
Blogging advice from Street Anatomy (3 messages)
Blogs and Web site resource.... (2 messages)
Botanical Drawing, A Beginner's Guide available now (32 messages)
Brush emergency (29 messages)
Cathy's Spiced nuts (2 messages)
Cindy Shaw (1 message)
Cindy Shaw & Grouper Moon (13 messages)
courses (3 messages)
courses (and wiki?) (5 messages)
Data recovery (27 messages)
deadline for art exhibit submissions ~ Ithaca (5 messages)
deadline is approaching! (1 message)
Dinosaurs in the news (3 messages)
Dorothia on BBC (2 messages)
Doug Pratt (7 messages)
Exhibition for GNSI members at University of North Carolina at Pembroke (3 messages)
ferret plagiarism on NPR (3 messages)
Fort Kent, ME,--09 conference locale (1 message)
glazing in oil (15 messages)
glazing in oil, John Whalley (7 messages)
glazing/painting on metal leaf (1 message)
GNSI Conference, Presenters and Instructors (1 message)
GNSI conferences (3 messages)
GNSi Member's work gets animated! (5 messages)
GNSI Summer Workshop 2008! (1 message)
GNSI-DC: Spring 2008 Meetings (1 message)
History of printed field guides and botanical art instruction (1 message)
images (7 messages)
INFO PAGE Exhibition for GNSI members at University of North Carolina at Pembroke (1 message)
inspired ideas (2 messages)
inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's (43 messages)
inspired ideas: process portfolio (1 message)
Linda Crane (1 message)
Live/Work Space_Write Off (11 messages)
MIeke and frog to Ithaca... yes! (3 messages)
More realistic Poser models? (31 messages)
More replies on the idea of Scientific illustration PhD (19 messages)
Networking Macs (5 messages)
New Illustration Workbook? (1 message)
new, smaller Cintiq tablet (1 message)
not so TAN: health insurance (16 messages)
old houses (20 messages)
old houses; DIGEST messages (1 message)
PA botanists? (1 message)
Poser/3d and Mac models? (3 messages)
Pricing for prepress stuff (3 messages)
Quark question (1 message)
Sales tax? (6 messages)
SCIART-L Digest - 26 Jan 2008 to 27 Jan 2008 (#2008-29) (1 message)
Shadow Bear strikes again (1 message)
SoCal GNSI annual party (1 message)
spiced nuts redux (3 messages)
Starred Review for Hannah! (4 messages)
summer course in Italy (1 message)
SWOP printer specs (14 messages)
takes a PhD to identify a duck (8 messages)
TAN Live/Work Space/address change (15 messages)
Tan-Amazing Africa Video (1 message)
TAN: A plagiarism tale (11 messages)
TAN: critters that share our food (3 messages)
TAN: medical paper comparing Canada and US (7 messages)
TAN: Re: [SCIART] TAN: toxic balance (4 messages)
TAN: Science Debate 2008 (1 message)
TAN: Teacher, may I use the basement please (4 messages)
TAN: toxic balance (49 messages)
TAN: trip to Burma (1 message)
TAN: Yeah, pretty. (14 messages)
TAN:Re: [SCIART] Brush emergency (2 messages)
Thank you! (1 message)
totally tan (5 messages)
tree idenfication? (5 messages)
tree identification (1 message)
watercolor paper, was Botanical Drawing (3 messages)
Who did this image? (2 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCIART-L Home

SCIART-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

3-D models

3-D models

Dorothia Rohner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:45:17 -0600

64 lines

New Thread

Advice on pricing for poster in South = Africa

Re: Advice on pricing for poster in South = Africa

Liz Day <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2008 04:01:32 -0800

28 lines

Re: Advice on pricing for poster in South = Africa

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2008 08:26:18 -0700

65 lines

New Thread

Advice on pricing for poster in South Africa

Advice on pricing for poster in South Africa

Christine Witters <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2008 13:57:24 -0800

31 lines

Re: Advice on pricing for poster in South Africa

Britt Griswold <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2008 18:11:49 -0500

28 lines

Re: Advice on pricing for poster in South Africa

Christine Witters <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2008 16:16:28 -0800

184 lines

Re: Advice on pricing for poster in South Africa

Christine Witters <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2008 16:49:33 -0800

63 lines

Re: Advice on pricing for poster in South Africa

Britt Griswold <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2008 20:00:35 -0500

33 lines

Re: Advice on pricing for poster in South Africa

Britt Griswold <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2008 20:37:14 -0500

58 lines

Re: Advice on pricing for poster in South Africa

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jan 2008 05:50:03 -0500

36 lines

Re: Advice on pricing for poster in South Africa

Anne_rr <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jan 2008 09:06:39 -0500

44 lines

Re: Advice on pricing for poster in South Africa

Jim Perkins <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jan 2008 17:07:12 -0500

148 lines

Re: Advice on pricing for poster in South Africa

Brie Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Jan 2008 18:42:37 -0500

233 lines

New Thread

Any scientific illustrators with PhD ... IN scientific illustration?

Any scientific illustrators with PhD ... IN scientific illustration?

Barbara Gleason <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2008 17:53:52 -0800

143 lines

Re: Any scientific illustrators with PhD ... IN scientific illustration?

Jim Perkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:49:39 -0500

247 lines

Re: Any scientific illustrators with PhD ... IN scientific illustration?

Tania Marien <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 08:02:12 -0800

25 lines

Re: Any scientific illustrators with PhD ... IN scientific illustration?

Deb Haines <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:16:03 -0800

115 lines

Re: Any scientific illustrators with PhD ... IN scientific illustration?

Deb Haines <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:18:03 -0800

168 lines

Re: Any scientific illustrators with PhD ... IN scientific illustration?

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:26:33 -0700

194 lines

Re: Any scientific illustrators with PhD ... IN scientific illustration?

Britt Griswold <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:05:39 -0500

30 lines

Re: Any scientific illustrators with PhD ... IN scientific illustration?

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:13:21 -0700

44 lines

Re: Any scientific illustrators with PhD ... IN scientific illustration?

Jim Perkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:37:37 -0500

138 lines

Re: Any scientific illustrators with PhD ... IN scientific illustration?

Anne Katharine Gutmann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:30:05 -0700

53 lines

Re: Any scientific illustrators with PhD ... IN scientific illustration?

Holmes, Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:33:52 -0600

114 lines

Re: Any scientific illustrators with PhD ... IN scientific illustration?

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:41:01 -0500

37 lines

Re: Any scientific illustrators with PhD ... IN scientific illustration?

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:44:31 -0700

49 lines

Re: Any scientific illustrators with PhD ... IN scientific illustration?

suzan wallace <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:19:40 -0500

78 lines

Re: Any scientific illustrators with PhD ... IN scientific illustration?

Jim Perkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:29:46 -0500

139 lines

Re: Any scientific illustrators with PhD ... IN scientific illustration?

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2008 05:30:32 -0500

54 lines

New Thread

Better transfer methods

Better transfer methods

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:17:45 -0700

37 lines

Re: Better transfer methods

David W. Ehlert, MAMS, CMI <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:23:42 -0800

230 lines

Re: Better transfer methods

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:32:03 -0700

72 lines

Re: Better transfer methods

Dorothia Rohner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:46:50 -0600

71 lines

Re: Better transfer methods

Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:28:53 -0600

60 lines

Re: Better transfer methods

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:06:28 -0500

40 lines

Re: Better transfer methods

Gail Guth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:19:56 -0500

79 lines

Re: Better transfer methods

Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:44:36 -0600

34 lines

Re: Better transfer methods

Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:45:22 -0600

26 lines

Re: Better transfer methods

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 07:05:07 -0700

78 lines

Re: Better transfer methods

Consie Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:39:47 -0500

129 lines

Re: Better transfer methods

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 07:28:57 -0700

46 lines

Re: Better transfer methods

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 07:38:43 -0700

142 lines

Re: Better transfer methods

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:23:51 -0500

209 lines

Re: Better transfer methods

Consie Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:45:26 -0500

208 lines

Re: Better transfer methods

Anne Runyon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:51:41 -0500

492 lines

New Thread

Blog use and inquire: Successful or not?

Blog use and inquire: Successful or not?

LISA BRANDT <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:10:34 +0000

85 lines

Re: Blog use and inquire: Successful or not?

Becky Uhler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:32:05 -0800

179 lines

Re: Blog use and inquire: Successful or not?

Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:52:12 -0600

90 lines

Re: Blog use and inquire: Successful or not?

Barbara Harmon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:29:33 -0500

142 lines

Re: Blog use and inquire: Successful or not?

Becky Uhler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:37:44 -0800

307 lines

Re: Blog use and inquire: Successful or not?

Becky Uhler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:17:27 -0800

225 lines

Re: Blog use and inquire: Successful or not?

Glendon Mellow <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:07:23 -0500

76 lines

Re: Blog use and inquire: Successful or not?

Britt Griswold <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:03:41 -0500

59 lines

Re: Blog use and inquire: Successful or not?

Gretchen Halpert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:03:17 -0500

265 lines

Re: Blog use and inquire: Successful or not?

Gail Guth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:16:58 -0500

82 lines

Re: Blog use and inquire: Successful or not?

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:29:15 EST

219 lines

Re: Blog use and inquire: Successful or not?

Becky Uhler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:23:00 -0800

253 lines

Re: Blog use and inquire: Successful or not?

Glendon Mellow <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:02:24 -0500

38 lines

Re: Blog use and inquire: Successful or not?

Britt Griswold <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:44:23 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

Blogging advice from Street Anatomy

Blogging advice from Street Anatomy

Vanessa Ruiz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:56:53 -0500

305 lines

Re: Blogging advice from Street Anatomy

Glendon Mellow <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:35:52 -0500

227 lines

Re: Blogging advice from Street Anatomy

LISA BRANDT <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:47:53 +0000

248 lines

New Thread

Blogs and Web site resource....

Blogs and Web site resource....

LISA BRANDT <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:38:52 +0000

192 lines

Re: Blogs and Web site resource....

duboisworks <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:09:53 -0500

114 lines

New Thread

Botanical Drawing, A Beginner's Guide available now

Botanical Drawing, A Beginner's Guide available now

Wendy Hollender <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:13:36 -0500

192 lines

Botanical Drawing, A Beginner's Guide Available Now

Wendy Hollender <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:24:05 -0600

39 lines

Re: Botanical Drawing, A Beginner's Guide Available Now

Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:32:06 -0600

70 lines

Re: Botanical Drawing, A Beginner's Guide available now

Amelia Hansen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:37:13 -0500

329 lines

Re: Botanical Drawing, A Beginner's Guide Available Now

Amelia Hansen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:41:15 -0500

270 lines

Re: Botanical Drawing, A Beginner's Guide Available Now

Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Jan 2008 16:56:07 -0600

113 lines

Re: Botanical Drawing, A Beginner's Guide Available Now

LISA BRANDT <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Jan 2008 01:56:40 +0000

121 lines

Re: Botanical Drawing, A Beginner's Guide Available Now

Sue Burrus <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:24:00 -0800

124 lines

Re: Botanical Drawing, A Beginner's Guide available now

Wendy Hollender <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:24:01 -0500

639 lines

Re: Botanical Drawing, A Beginner's Guide available now

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:19:12 -0500

70 lines

Re: Botanical Drawing, A Beginner's Guide available now

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:20:01 -0500

90 lines

Re: Botanical Drawing, A Beginner's Guide available now

Wendy Hollender <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:41:01 -0500

334 lines

Re: Botanical Drawing, A Beginner's Guide available now

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:16:54 -0500

80 lines

Re: Botanical Drawing, A Beginner's Guide available now

Glendon Mellow <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:11:59 -0500

58 lines

Re: Botanical Drawing, A Beginner's Guide available now

Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:34:14 -0600

49 lines

Re: Botanical Drawing, A Beginner's Guide available now

Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:37:58 -0600

42 lines

Re: Botanical Drawing, A Beginner's Guide available now

Amelia Hansen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:43:03 -0500

209 lines

Re: Botanical Drawing, A Beginner's Guide available now

Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:05:19 -0600

66 lines

Re: Botanical Drawing, A Beginner's Guide available now

Brie Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:20:43 -0500

72 lines

Re: Botanical Drawing, A Beginner's Guide available now

Brie Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:52:20 -0500

116 lines

Re: Botanical Drawing, A Beginner's Guide available now

Glendon Mellow <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:56:52 -0500

51 lines

Re: Botanical Drawing, A Beginner's Guide available now

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:10:38 -0700

46 lines

Re: Botanical Drawing, A Beginner's Guide available now

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:11:14 -0500

59 lines

Re: Botanical Drawing, A Beginner's Guide available now

Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:21:57 -0600

41 lines

Re: Botanical Drawing, A Beginner's Guide available now

Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:25:34 -0600

48 lines

Re: Botanical Drawing, A Beginner's Guide available now

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:17:34 -0500

77 lines

Re: Botanical Drawing, A Beginner's Guide Available Now

Amelia Hansen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:31:13 -0500

241 lines

Re: Botanical Drawing, A Beginner's Guide Available Now

Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:45:52 -0600

69 lines

Re: Botanical Drawing, A Beginner's Guide Available Now

Amelia Hansen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:23:59 -0500

498 lines

Re: Botanical Drawing, A Beginner's Guide Available Now

Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:03:31 -0600

139 lines

Re: Botanical Drawing, A Beginner's Guide Available Now

Anne_rr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:07:46 -0500

350 lines

Re: Botanical Drawing, A Beginner's Guide available now

Mark Klingler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:12:18 -0500

263 lines

New Thread

Brush emergency

Brush emergency

The Schaudt's <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:36:40 -0600

57 lines

Re: Brush emergency

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:15:44 -0500

58 lines

Re: Brush emergency

The Schaudt's <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:34:00 -0600

70 lines

Re: Brush emergency

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:01:04 -0500

36 lines

Re: Brush emergency

Anne_rr <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:54:53 -0500

202 lines

Re: Brush emergency

The Schaudt's <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:25:59 -0600

134 lines

Re: Brush emergency

Brie Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:11:05 -0500

112 lines

Re: Brush emergency

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:18:46 -0500

121 lines

Re: Brush emergency

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:29:49 -0500

36 lines

Re: Brush emergency

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:47:45 -0700

101 lines

Re: Brush emergency

The Schaudt's <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:41:32 -0600

134 lines

Re: Brush emergency

Geoff Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:30:16 +1100

26 lines

Re: Brush emergency

mali moir <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:31:44 +0000

88 lines

Re: Brush emergency

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 06:31:17 -0500

65 lines

Re: Brush emergency

Amelia Hansen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 08:02:16 -0500

235 lines

Re: Brush emergency

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:08:37 -0500

56 lines

Re: Brush emergency

Anne Runyon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:52:22 -0500

152 lines

Re: Brush emergency

Barry K. MacKay <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:50:19 -0500

247 lines

Re: Brush emergency

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:19:31 -0500

40 lines

Re: Brush emergency

Consie Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:35:36 -0500

99 lines

Re: Brush emergency

Amelia Hansen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:05:01 -0500

214 lines

Brush Emergency

The Schaudt's <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:28:06 -0600

183 lines

Re: Brush emergency

Geoff Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:38:14 +1100

49 lines

Re: Brush emergency

Geoff Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:52:25 +1100

68 lines

Re: Brush emergency

Lore Ruttan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:03:24 -0500

78 lines

Re: Brush Emergency

Brie Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:32:18 -0500

344 lines

Re: Brush Emergency

Brie Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:34:49 -0500

360 lines

Re: Brush Emergency

The Schaudt's <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:22:51 -0600

212 lines

Re: Brush Emergency

The Schaudt's <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:26:15 -0600

50 lines

New Thread

Cathy's Spiced nuts

Cathy's Spiced nuts

Bruce Gaber <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2008 15:38:44 -0500

21 lines

Re: Cathy's Spiced nuts

Britt Griswold <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2008 16:25:29 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

Cindy Shaw

Cindy Shaw

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 16:07:34 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

Cindy Shaw & Grouper Moon

Re: Cindy Shaw & Grouper Moon

Jaynie Martz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 16:22:13 -0500

34 lines

Re: Cindy Shaw & Grouper Moon

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 16:36:17 -0500

39 lines

Re: Cindy Shaw & Grouper Moon

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 17:02:38 -0500

49 lines

Re: Cindy Shaw & Grouper Moon

Anne_rr <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 17:12:28 -0500

59 lines

Re: Cindy Shaw & Grouper Moon

Britt Griswold <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 17:29:11 -0500

43 lines

Re: Cindy Shaw & Grouper Moon

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 18:42:42 -0500

66 lines

Re: Cindy Shaw & Grouper Moon

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 18:43:24 -0500

51 lines

Re: Cindy Shaw & Grouper Moon

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 18:57:01 -0500

34 lines

Re: Cindy Shaw & Grouper Moon

Cindy Shaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 23:19:31 -0800

76 lines

Re: Cindy Shaw & Grouper Moon

Anne_rr <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2008 08:11:05 -0500

101 lines

Re: Cindy Shaw & Grouper Moon

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2008 08:23:28 -0500

127 lines

Re: Cindy Shaw & Grouper Moon

Cindy Shaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2008 23:12:37 -0800

134 lines

Re: Cindy Shaw & Grouper Moon

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2008 05:21:11 -0500

161 lines

New Thread

courses

Re: courses

peter green <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:25:30 -0500

106 lines

Re: courses

Marjorie Leggitt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:35:59 -0700

64 lines

Re: courses

Gretchen Halpert <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:13:04 -0500

72 lines

New Thread

courses (and wiki?)

courses (and wiki?)

peter green <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:23:40 -0500

43 lines

Re: courses (and wiki?)

Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:10:25 -0600

41 lines

courses (and wiki?)

peter green <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:38:54 -0500

73 lines

Re: courses (and wiki?)

Jim Perkins <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:31:56 -0500

210 lines

Re: courses (and wiki?)

Carol Creech <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Jan 2008 05:37:19 -0800

79 lines

New Thread

Data recovery

Data recovery

Cindy Shaw <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:35:17 -0500

20 lines

Re: Data recovery

Jeremy Stoller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:53:16 -0800

46 lines

Re: Data recovery

jeremy swan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:59:21 -0500

92 lines

Re: Data recovery

Phillip Vogel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:24:00 -0500

48 lines

Re: Data recovery

jeremy swan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:56:06 -0500

87 lines

Re: Data recovery

Cindy Shaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:20:57 -0800

79 lines

Re: Data recovery

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:20:45 -0700

131 lines

Re: Data recovery

Britt Griswold <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:39:01 -0500

44 lines

Re: Data recovery

Cindy Shaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:24:50 -0800

68 lines

Re: Data recovery

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:32:22 -0700

96 lines

Re: Data recovery

Britt Griswold <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:09:58 -0500

33 lines

Re: Data recovery

Cindy Shaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:17:02 -0800

40 lines

Re: Data recovery

Britt Griswold <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:19:37 -0500

24 lines

Re: Data recovery

Brie Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:48:58 -0500

64 lines

Re: Data recovery

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:20:32 -0500

46 lines

Re: Data recovery

Brie Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:39:10 -0500

83 lines

Re: Data recovery

Gail Guth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:54:04 -0500

94 lines

Re: Data recovery

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:53:14 -0500

66 lines

Re: Data recovery

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:01:44 -0700

41 lines

Re: Data recovery

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:29:15 -0500

80 lines

Re: Data recovery

Gail Guth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:36:48 -0500

181 lines

Re: Data recovery

Gail Guth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:39:44 -0500

64 lines

Re: Data recovery

Cindy Shaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:49:43 -0800

77 lines

Re: Data recovery

Chuck Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:03:30 -0500

111 lines

Re: Data recovery

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:11:23 -0700

32 lines

Re: Data recovery

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:58:12 -0500

30 lines

Re: Data recovery

Gail Guth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:02:31 -0500

86 lines

New Thread

deadline for art exhibit submissions ~ Ithaca

deadline for art exhibit submissions ~ Ithaca

margaretnelson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:10:56 -0500

25 lines

Re: deadline for art exhibit submissions ~ Ithaca

Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:44:38 -0600

43 lines

Re: deadline for art exhibit submissions ~ Ithaca

Gail Guth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:17:24 -0500

28 lines

Re: deadline for art exhibit submissions ~ Ithaca

Patty McGrane Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:10:03 -0800

47 lines

Re: deadline for art exhibit submissions ~ Ithaca

Geoff Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:14:14 +1100

53 lines

New Thread

deadline is approaching!

deadline is approaching!

margaretnelson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:34:42 -0500

42 lines

New Thread

Dinosaurs in the news

Dinosaurs in the news

Britt Griswold <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2008 14:28:34 -0500

23 lines

Re: Dinosaurs in the news

Frank Ippolito <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2008 14:44:07 -0500

54 lines

Re: Dinosaurs in the news

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2008 16:54:08 -0500

108 lines

New Thread

Dorothia on BBC

Dorothia on BBC

Kalliopi Monoyios <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2008 11:40:32 -0600

35 lines

Re: Dorothia on BBC

duboisworks <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2008 18:54:45 -0500

52 lines

New Thread

Doug Pratt

Doug Pratt

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2008 17:02:40 -0500

54 lines

Re: Doug Pratt

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2008 15:07:02 -0700

60 lines

Re: Doug Pratt

Mieke Roth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2008 23:14:53 +0100

237 lines

Re: Doug Pratt

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2008 19:55:58 -0500

172 lines

Re: Doug Pratt

Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2008 19:34:18 -0600

57 lines

Re: Doug Pratt

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2008 21:10:55 -0500

106 lines

Re: Doug Pratt

Barry K. MacKay <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2008 21:49:44 -0500

283 lines

New Thread

Exhibition for GNSI members at University of North Carolina at Pembroke

Exhibition for GNSI members at University of North Carolina at Pembroke

MARGIE LABADIE <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jan 2008 11:35:11 -0500

399 lines

Re: Exhibition for GNSI members at University of North Carolina at Pembroke

suzan wallace <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:44:14 -0500

91 lines

Re: Exhibition for GNSI members at University of North Carolina at Pembroke

MARGIE LABADIE <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:19:25 -0500

183 lines

New Thread

ferret plagiarism on NPR

ferret plagiarism on NPR

plittle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:29:29 -0700

19 lines

Re: ferret plagiarism on NPR

Amelia Hansen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:27:52 -0500

223 lines

Re: ferret plagiarism on NPR

Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:43:57 -0600

61 lines

New Thread

Fort Kent, ME,--09 conference locale

Fort Kent, ME,--09 conference locale

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:26:53 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

glazing in oil

glazing in oil

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:03:40 -0500

106 lines

Re: glazing in oil

David W. Ehlert, MAMS, CMI <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:14:25 -0800

63 lines

Re: glazing in oil

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:19:00 -0500

62 lines

Re: glazing in oil

Glendon Mellow <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:30:31 -0500

55 lines

Re: glazing in oil

Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:48:55 -0600

50 lines

Re: glazing in oil

Brie Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:50:36 -0500

20 lines

Re: glazing in oil

Brie Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:58:59 -0500

30 lines

Re: glazing in oil

Amelia Hansen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2008 09:33:07 -0500

138 lines

Re: glazing in oil

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2008 09:47:54 -0500

88 lines

Re: glazing in oil

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2008 09:56:52 -0500

179 lines

Re: glazing in oil

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2008 09:58:49 -0500

138 lines

Re: glazing in oil

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:39:04 -0700

45 lines

Re: glazing in oil

Brie Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:44:56 -0500

52 lines

Re: glazing in oil

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:11:46 -0700

63 lines

Re: glazing in oil

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:41:57 -0500

56 lines

New Thread

glazing in oil, John Whalley

Re: glazing in oil, John Whalley

Robert Golder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:12:22 -0500

22 lines

Re: glazing in oil, John Whalley

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:49:37 -0500

57 lines

Re: glazing in oil, John Whalley

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:09:08 -0500

45 lines

Re: glazing in oil, John Whalley

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:37:58 -0500

34 lines

Re: glazing in oil, John Whalley

David W. Ehlert, MAMS, CMI <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:14:44 -0800

31 lines

Re: glazing in oil, John Whalley

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:28:57 -0500

65 lines

Re: glazing in oil, John Whalley

David W. Ehlert, MAMS, CMI <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:38:52 -0800

96 lines

New Thread

glazing/painting on metal leaf

Re: glazing/painting on metal leaf

mali moir <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:23:11 +0000

137 lines

New Thread

GNSI Conference, Presenters and Instructors

GNSI Conference, Presenters and Instructors

margaretnelson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:50:43 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

GNSI conferences

GNSI conferences

Gretchen Halpert <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2008 13:17:22 -0500

1223 lines

Re: GNSI conferences

Jim Perkins <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2008 13:29:12 -0500

568 lines

Re: GNSI conferences

Gretchen Halpert <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2008 15:39:43 -0500

508 lines

New Thread

GNSi Member's work gets animated!

GNSi Member's work gets animated!

Britt Griswold <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:03:15 -0500

24 lines

Re: GNSi Member's work gets animated!

Britt Griswold <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:33:27 -0500

43 lines

Re: GNSi Member's work gets animated!

Geoff Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:40:38 +1100

52 lines

Re: GNSi Member's work gets animated!

Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:14:04 -0600

67 lines

Re: GNSi Member's work gets animated!

Diana Marques <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:33:58 -0500

48 lines

New Thread

GNSI Summer Workshop 2008!

GNSI Summer Workshop 2008!

Cassio Lynm <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:22:07 -0600

95 lines

New Thread

GNSI-DC: Spring 2008 Meetings

GNSI-DC: Spring 2008 Meetings

Britt Griswold <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2008 18:18:50 -0500

167 lines

New Thread

History of printed field guides and botanical art instruction

History of printed field guides and botanical art instruction

Marjorie Leggitt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:52:39 -0700

63 lines

New Thread

images

images

Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2008 00:09:51 -0600

37 lines

Re: images

Mieke Roth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2008 11:00:25 +0100

59 lines

Re: images

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2008 06:00:45 -0500

44 lines

Re: images

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2008 08:11:37 -0500

41 lines

Re: images

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2008 06:57:44 -0700

50 lines

Re: images

Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2008 08:10:40 -0600

41 lines

Re: images

Amelia Hansen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2008 09:44:52 -0500

255 lines

New Thread

INFO PAGE Exhibition for GNSI members at University of North Carolina at Pembroke

INFO PAGE Exhibition for GNSI members at University of North Carolina at Pembroke

MARGIE LABADIE <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 09:20:40 -0500

176 lines

New Thread

inspired ideas

Re: inspired ideas

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:29:46 -0500

17 lines

Re: inspired ideas

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:09:55 -0500

49 lines

New Thread

inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

suzan wallace <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2008 01:25:29 -0500

64 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Dj Sproat <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2008 20:35:18 -0500

113 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

suzan wallace <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:19:13 -0500

136 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Lore Ruttan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:59:15 -0500

168 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:13:51 -0500

79 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:30:38 -0500

73 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Anne_rr <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2008 10:53:38 -0500

145 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

suzan wallace <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2008 11:15:45 -0500

111 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Anne_rr <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:25:06 -0500

134 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

suzan wallace <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:57:33 -0500

155 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Heather Ward <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2008 10:56:32 -0800

581 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:02:20 -0500

84 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:23:00 -0500

42 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:29:33 -0500

29 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Dj Sproat <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:01:39 -0500

258 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:15:48 -0500

47 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:34:56 -0600

64 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:06:43 -0500

35 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Geoff Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:32:16 +1100

53 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Gretchen Halpert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:39:44 -0500

109 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Amelia Hansen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:01:05 -0500

248 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:58:23 -0600

43 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Barbara Harmon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:47:26 -0500

220 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Dorothia Rohner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:07:17 -0600

438 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Glendon Mellow <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 06:08:34 -0500

95 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:43:56 -0500

53 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:41:01 -0600

30 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Gail Guth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:52:47 -0500

168 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:57:38 -0500

103 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Brie Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:59:32 -0500

201 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Gretchen Halpert <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:08:39 -0500

182 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:09:31 -0500

42 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Gail Guth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:09:37 -0500

255 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Glendon Mellow <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:47:52 -0500

43 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Britt Griswold <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:45:59 -0500

28 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Glendon Mellow <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:49:17 -0500

66 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

LISA BRANDT <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:58:16 +0000

112 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Britt Griswold <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:43:03 -0500

30 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:35:18 -0600

56 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Glendon Mellow <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:25:11 -0500

61 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Glendon Mellow <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:26:25 -0500

97 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:58:26 -0600

84 lines

Re: inspired ideas of Scientific illustration PhD's

LISA BRANDT <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:55:01 +0000

115 lines

New Thread

inspired ideas: process portfolio

Re: inspired ideas: process portfolio

suzan wallace <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:13:27 -0500

52 lines

New Thread

Linda Crane

Linda Crane

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:30:10 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

Live/Work Space_Write Off

Re: Live/Work Space_Write Off

Gretchen Halpert <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jan 2008 12:56:37 -0500

201 lines

Re: Live/Work Space_Write Off

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jan 2008 15:43:51 -0500

23 lines

Re: Live/Work Space_Write Off

Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jan 2008 16:02:41 -0600

40 lines

Re: Live/Work Space_Write Off

Amelia Hansen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jan 2008 17:53:07 -0500

217 lines

Re: Live/Work Space_Write Off

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2008 07:22:12 -0500

62 lines

Re: Live/Work Space_Write Off

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2008 07:49:13 -0500

70 lines

Re: Live/Work Space_Write Off

Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2008 08:18:06 -0600

81 lines

Re: Live/Work Space_Write Off

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2008 10:21:54 -0500

68 lines

Re: Live/Work Space_Write Off

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:11:33 -0500

60 lines

Re: Live/Work Space_Write Off

Karl Gehrman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2008 10:37:18 -0800

222 lines

Re: Live/Work Space_Write Off

Gail Guth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2008 14:02:27 -0500

244 lines

New Thread

MIeke and frog to Ithaca... yes!

MIeke and frog to Ithaca... yes!

Barbara Gleason <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:03:22 -0800

212 lines

Re: MIeke and frog to Ithaca... yes!

Mieke Roth <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:44:43 +0100

688 lines

Re: MIeke and frog to Ithaca... yes!

Britt Griswold <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:30:43 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

More realistic Poser models?

More realistic Poser models?

Tami Tolpa <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:15:13 -0800

96 lines

Re: More realistic Poser models?

Mieke Roth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2008 12:26:36 +0100

418 lines

Re: More realistic Poser models?

plittle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2008 07:42:09 -0700

138 lines

Re: More realistic Poser models?

Amelia Hansen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:26:40 -0500

491 lines

Re: More realistic Poser models?

Frank Ippolito <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:19:41 -0500

372 lines

Re: More realistic Poser models?

plittle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:05:34 -0700

410 lines

Re: More realistic Poser models?

Mieke Roth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:46:44 +0100

1141 lines

Re: More realistic Poser models?

Britt Griswold <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:38:50 -0500

59 lines

Re: More realistic Poser models?

Chuck Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:51:48 -0500

867 lines

Re: More realistic Poser models?

Mieke Roth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:57:47 +0100

76 lines

Re: More realistic Poser models?

Amelia Hansen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:11:48 -0500

1258 lines

Re: More realistic Poser models?

Gretchen Halpert <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:33:21 -0500

1282 lines

Re: More realistic Poser models?

Anne_rr <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:53:56 -0500

1761 lines

Re: More realistic Poser models?

Jim Perkins <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2008 13:23:09 -0500

631 lines

Re: More realistic Poser models?

Gretchen Halpert <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2008 15:42:01 -0500

206 lines

Re: More realistic Poser models?

Mieke Roth <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2008 21:53:24 +0100

2025 lines

Re: More realistic Poser models?

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:37:16 -0500

29 lines

Re: More realistic Poser models?

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Jan 2008 21:42:16 -0500

32 lines

Re: More realistic Poser models?

Amelia Hansen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:54:16 -0500

188 lines

Re: More realistic Poser models?

Chuck Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:50:27 -0500

1483 lines

Re: More realistic Poser models?

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:21:12 -0500

300 lines

Re: More realistic Poser models?

Britt Griswold <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:12:38 -0500

20 lines

Re: More realistic Poser models?

Britt Griswold <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:17:55 -0500

45 lines

Re: More realistic Poser models?

Mieke Roth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:50:20 +0100

2858 lines

Re: More realistic Poser models?

Chuck Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:57:37 -0500

1819 lines

Re: More realistic Poser models?

Frank Ippolito <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:07:45 -0500

454 lines

Re: More realistic Poser models?

Chuck Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:12:15 -0500

457 lines

Re: More realistic Poser models?

Mieke Roth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:13:34 +0100

30 lines

Re: More realistic Poser models?

Mieke Roth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:32:42 +0100

482 lines

Re: More realistic Poser models?

Frank Ippolito <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:41:39 -0500

1096 lines

Re: More realistic Poser models?

Mieke Roth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:22:14 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

More replies on the idea of Scientific illustration PhD

More replies on the idea of Scientific illustration PhD

Barbara Gleason <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:24:26 -0800

753 lines

Re: More replies on the idea of Scientific illustration PhD

Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2008 01:26:28 -0600

310 lines

Re: More replies on the idea of Scientific illustration PhD

Jim Perkins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2008 08:43:03 -0500

94 lines

Re: More replies on the idea of Scientific illustration PhD

suzan wallace <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:58:35 -0500

109 lines

Re: More replies on the idea of Scientific illustration PhD

David W. Ehlert, MAMS, CMI <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:04:59 -0800

578 lines

Re: More replies on the idea of Scientific illustration PhD

Jim Perkins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:37:59 -0500

84 lines

Re: More replies on the idea of Scientific illustration PhD

plittle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:57:11 -0700

477 lines

Re: More replies on the idea of Scientific illustration PhD

Mieke Roth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:57:53 +0100

30 lines

Re: More replies on the idea of Scientific illustration PhD

Silvia Troyo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:32:10 -0600

31 lines

Re: More replies on the idea of Scientific illustration PhD

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:56:02 -0500

58 lines

Re: More replies on the idea of Scientific illustration PhD

wendy hiller gee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:25:19 -0800

182 lines

Re: More replies on the idea of Scientific illustration PhD

Silvia Troyo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:32:08 -0600

126 lines

Re: More replies on the idea of Scientific illustration PhD

Dj Sproat <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:42:38 -0500

206 lines

Re: More replies on the idea of Scientific illustration PhD

Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:36:07 -0600

31 lines

Re: More replies on the idea of Scientific illustration PhD

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:40:19 -0500

67 lines

Re: More replies on the idea of Scientific illustration PhD

Dino Pulera <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:43:45 -0500

726 lines

Re: More replies on the idea of Scientific illustration PhD

chris gralapp <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:58:29 -0800

763 lines

Re: More replies on the idea of Scientific illustration PhD

Dj Sproat <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:21:26 -0500

767 lines

Re: More replies on the idea of Scientific illustration PhD

Deb Haines <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:10:27 -0800

127 lines

New Thread

Networking Macs

Networking Macs

Cindy Shaw <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:47:19 -0800

49 lines

Re: Networking Macs

Britt Griswold <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:32:56 -0500

57 lines

Re: Networking Macs

Jim Perkins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:33:11 -0500

264 lines

Re: Networking Macs

Cindy Shaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:00:00 -0800

125 lines

Re: Networking Macs

Britt Griswold <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:12:04 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

New Illustration Workbook?

New Illustration Workbook?

LISA BRANDT <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 06:52:21 +0000

60 lines

New Thread

new, smaller Cintiq tablet

new, smaller Cintiq tablet

Anne Katharine Gutmann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:22:39 -0700

48 lines

New Thread

not so TAN: health insurance

not so TAN: health insurance

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2008 07:45:29 -0500

39 lines

Re: not so TAN: health insurance

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2008 09:57:52 -0500

49 lines

Re: not so TAN: health insurance

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2008 10:34:53 -0500

50 lines

Re: not so TAN: health insurance

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2008 10:50:54 -0500

87 lines

Re: not so TAN: health insurance

Phillip Vogel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2008 11:25:52 -0500

369 lines

Re: not so TAN: health insurance

Mieke Roth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2008 17:57:41 +0100

408 lines

Re: not so TAN: health insurance

Dj Sproat <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:30:39 -0500

449 lines

Re: not so TAN: health insurance

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2008 15:05:46 -0500

299 lines

Re: not so TAN: health insurance

Britt Griswold <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2008 15:21:32 -0500

69 lines

Re: not so TAN: health insurance

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2008 15:24:55 -0500

66 lines

Re: not so TAN: health insurance

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2008 15:32:03 -0500

150 lines

Re: not so TAN: health insurance

Dj Sproat <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2008 16:27:20 -0500

142 lines

Re: not so TAN: health insurance

Glendon Mellow <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2008 17:54:39 -0500

58 lines

Re: not so TAN: health insurance

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2008 20:18:09 -0500

92 lines

Re: Not so TAN: health insurance

Hannah Bonner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 07:28:30 -0500

35 lines

Re: Not so TAN: health insurance

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:23:25 -0500

99 lines

New Thread

old houses

old houses

Liz Day <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2008 22:20:58 -0800

38 lines

Re: old houses

Chuck Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 10:47:31 -0500

46 lines

Re: old houses

Tricia Cassady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 10:55:38 -0500

54 lines

Re: old houses

LISA BRANDT <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 16:22:30 +0000

109 lines

Re: old houses

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 11:27:32 -0500

62 lines

Re: old houses

Tricia Cassady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 11:35:33 -0500

72 lines

Re: old houses

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 12:01:46 -0500

101 lines

Re: old houses

Tricia Cassady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 12:06:37 -0500

113 lines

Re: old houses

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 12:11:33 -0500

127 lines

Re: old houses

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 10:19:36 -0700

143 lines

Re: old houses

Brenden Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 09:41:21 -0800

35 lines

Re: old houses

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 14:48:06 -0500

152 lines

Re: old houses

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 14:50:17 -0500

37 lines

Re: old houses

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 13:04:17 -0700

167 lines

Re: old houses

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 15:14:40 -0500

41 lines

Re: old houses

Brenden Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2008 07:35:52 -0800

41 lines

Re: old houses

Jim Perkins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2008 11:58:15 -0500

74 lines

Re: old houses

Tricia Cassady <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2008 13:16:49 -0500

73 lines

Re: old houses

Anne_rr <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2008 13:29:41 -0500

122 lines

Re: old houses

Brenden Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Jan 2008 11:51:41 -0800

46 lines

New Thread

old houses; DIGEST messages

Re: old houses; DIGEST messages

Liz Day <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 23:26:33 -0800

53 lines

New Thread

PA botanists?

PA botanists?

Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:11:49 -0600

25 lines

New Thread

Poser/3d and Mac models?

Re: Poser/3d and Mac models?

Karl Gehrman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:43:25 -0800

560 lines

Re: Poser/3d and Mac models?

Britt Griswold <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:43:47 -0500

27 lines

Re: Poser/3d and Mac models?

Karl Gehrman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:21:53 -0800

42 lines

New Thread

Pricing for prepress stuff

Pricing for prepress stuff

Cindy Shaw <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2008 23:09:46 -0800

18 lines

Re: Pricing for prepress stuff

Britt Griswold <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2008 12:21:21 -0500

23 lines

Re: Pricing for prepress stuff

Cindy Shaw <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2008 14:41:05 -0800

31 lines

New Thread

Quark question

Quark question

Marian Guta <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Jan 2008 09:16:32 -0800

80 lines

New Thread

Sales tax?

Re: Sales tax?

Alison Schroeer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:42:08 -0500

30 lines

Re: Sales tax?

chris gralapp <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:54:30 -0800

74 lines

Re: Sales tax?

Phillip Vogel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:31:22 -0500

53 lines

Re: Sales tax?

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:12:29 -0700

53 lines

Re: Sales tax?

The Schaudt's <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:09:48 -0600

53 lines

Re: Sales tax?

Alison Schroeer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:13:01 -0500

58 lines

New Thread

SCIART-L Digest - 26 Jan 2008 to 27 Jan 2008 (#2008-29)

Re: SCIART-L Digest - 26 Jan 2008 to 27 Jan 2008 (#2008-29)

Judith Stoffer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2008 07:34:45 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

Shadow Bear strikes again

Shadow Bear strikes again

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:02:34 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

SoCal GNSI annual party

SoCal GNSI annual party

Jeremy Stoller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:18:42 -0800

35 lines

New Thread

spiced nuts redux

spiced nuts redux

Bruce Gaber <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2008 16:30:56 -0500

79 lines

Re: spiced nuts redux

Gail Guth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2008 17:49:26 -0500

134 lines

Re: spiced nuts redux

Marjorie Leggitt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2008 16:18:54 -0700

100 lines

New Thread

Starred Review for Hannah!

Starred Review for Hannah!

Consie Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2008 19:50:37 -0500

38 lines

Re: Starred Review for Hannah!

Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2008 23:47:48 -0600

55 lines

Re: Starred Review for Hannah!

Hannah Bonner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2008 11:43:48 -0500

75 lines

Re: Starred Review for Hannah!

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2008 10:19:26 -0700

51 lines

New Thread

summer course in Italy

summer course in Italy

Gretchen Halpert <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:47:40 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

SWOP printer specs

SWOP printer specs

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2008 13:37:01 -0700

26 lines

Re: SWOP printer specs

Britt Griswold <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2008 15:59:06 -0500

49 lines

Re: SWOP printer specs

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2008 14:11:32 -0700

70 lines

Re: SWOP printer specs

Dorothia Rohner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2008 15:25:31 -0600

77 lines

Re: SWOP printer specs

Britt Griswold <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2008 16:44:47 -0500

32 lines

Re: SWOP printer specs

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Jan 2008 15:58:39 -0700

47 lines

Re: SWOP printer specs

Jim Perkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2008 00:13:55 -0500

134 lines

Re: SWOP printer specs

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2008 07:53:54 -0700

87 lines

Re: SWOP printer specs

Jim Perkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2008 11:37:39 -0500

256 lines

Re: SWOP printer specs

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2008 10:16:17 -0700

160 lines

Re: SWOP printer specs

Jim Perkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2008 13:12:10 -0500

396 lines

Re: SWOP printer specs

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2008 11:23:11 -0700

255 lines

Re: SWOP printer specs

Britt Griswold <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2008 13:29:28 -0500

54 lines

Re: SWOP printer specs

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Jan 2008 12:03:33 -0700

68 lines

New Thread

takes a PhD to identify a duck

Re: takes a PhD to identify a duck

suzan wallace <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:23:19 -0500

92 lines

Re: takes a PhD to identify a duck

Gail Guth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:20:27 -0500

191 lines

Re: takes a PhD to identify a duck

Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:34:22 -0600

44 lines

Re: takes a PhD to identify a duck

Geoff Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 03:48:27 +1100

202 lines

Re: takes a PhD to identify a duck

suzan wallace <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:55:21 -0500

212 lines

Re: takes a PhD to identify a duck

Gail Guth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:57:12 -0500

229 lines

Re: takes a PhD to identify a duck

Gail Guth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:09:28 -0500

251 lines

Re: takes a PhD to identify a duck

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:12:48 -0500

257 lines

New Thread

TAN Live/Work Space/address change

Re: TAN Live/Work Space/address change

Gretchen Halpert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2008 17:41:08 -0500

458 lines

Re: TAN Live/Work Space/address change

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2008 18:43:11 -0500

343 lines

Re: TAN Live/Work Space/address change

Dj Sproat <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2008 19:16:35 -0500

951 lines

Re: TAN Live/Work Space/address change

Gail Guth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2008 20:07:07 -0500

653 lines

Re: TAN Live/Work Space/address change

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2008 20:32:33 -0500

64 lines

Re: TAN Live/Work Space/address change

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 05:40:13 -0500

71 lines

Re: TAN Live/Work Space/address change

Tricia Cassady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 08:30:18 -0500

701 lines

Re: TAN Live/Work Space/address change

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 09:39:34 -0500

46 lines

Re: TAN Live/Work Space/address change

Tricia Cassady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 09:42:25 -0500

70 lines

Re: TAN Live/Work Space/address change

Gail Guth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 11:06:27 -0500

778 lines

Re: TAN Live/Work Space/address change

Tricia Cassady <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 11:12:58 -0500

807 lines

Re: TAN Live/Work Space/address change

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 11:28:48 -0500

473 lines

Re: TAN Live/Work Space/address change

Gail Guth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 11:46:15 -0500

439 lines

Re: TAN Live/Work Space/address change

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 12:07:58 -0500

445 lines

Re: TAN Live/Work Space/address change

Gail Guth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 12:12:45 -0500

469 lines

New Thread

Tan-Amazing Africa Video

Tan-Amazing Africa Video

Dorothia Rohner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:42:17 -0600

65 lines

New Thread

TAN: A plagiarism tale

TAN: A plagiarism tale

Brie Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:54:55 -0500

71 lines

Re: TAN: A plagiarism tale

Chuck Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:32:58 -0500

112 lines

Re: TAN: A plagiarism tale

Dj Sproat <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:56:14 -0500

136 lines

Re: TAN: A plagiarism tale

Chuck Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:04:52 -0500

150 lines

Re: TAN: A plagiarism tale

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:28:26 -0500

132 lines

Re: TAN: A plagiarism tale

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:14:59 -0700

168 lines

Re: TAN: A plagiarism tale

Karl Gehrman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:39:32 -0800

143 lines

Re: TAN: A plagiarism tale

Brie Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:22:54 -0500

150 lines

Re: TAN: A plagiarism tale

Brie Dodson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:30:03 -0500

126 lines

Re: TAN: A plagiarism tale

Chuck Carter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:49:21 -0500

135 lines

Re: TAN: A plagiarism tale

Barry K. MacKay <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:54:27 -0500

174 lines

New Thread

TAN: critters that share our food

Re: TAN: critters that share our food

Kalliopi Monoyios <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 12:12:48 -0600

168 lines

Re: TAN: critters that share our food

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:17:36 -0500

192 lines

Re: TAN: critters that share our food

Patty McGrane Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:45:59 -0800

229 lines

New Thread

TAN: medical paper comparing Canada and US

TAN: medical paper comparing Canada and US

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2008 09:41:10 -0500

456 lines

Re: TAN: medical paper comparing Canada and US

Jim Perkins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:00:16 -0500

614 lines

Re: TAN: medical paper comparing Canada and US

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2008 12:06:48 -0500

36 lines

Re: TAN: medical paper comparing Canada and US

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Jan 2008 13:16:05 -0500

91 lines

Re: TAN: medical paper comparing Canada and US

Jim Perkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 01:16:02 -0500

164 lines

Re: TAN: medical paper comparing Canada and US

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 08:00:14 -0500

57 lines

Re: TAN: medical paper comparing Canada and US

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:18:58 -0500

120 lines

New Thread

TAN: Re: [SCIART] TAN: toxic balance

TAN: Re: [SCIART] TAN: toxic balance

Gail Guth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:30:14 -0500

124 lines

Re: TAN: Re: [SCIART] TAN: toxic balance

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:55:17 -0500

119 lines

Re: TAN: Re: [SCIART] TAN: toxic balance

Gail Guth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:59:04 -0500

191 lines

Re: TAN: Re: [SCIART] TAN: toxic balance

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 12:51:52 -0500

178 lines

New Thread

TAN: Science Debate 2008

TAN: Science Debate 2008

Jeremy Stoller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:47:22 -0800

71 lines

New Thread

TAN: Teacher, may I use the basement please

TAN: Teacher, may I use the basement please

Karl Gehrman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2008 14:14:40 -0800

260 lines

Re: TAN: Teacher, may I use the basement please

Gretchen Halpert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2008 17:51:12 -0500

489 lines

Re: TAN: Teacher, may I use the basement please

Karl Gehrman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2008 15:22:52 -0800

3110 lines

Re: TAN: Teacher, may I use the basement please

Phillip Vogel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2008 18:44:48 -0500

2562 lines

New Thread

TAN: toxic balance

TAN: toxic balance

Amelia Hansen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:07:25 -0500

335 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

The Schaudt's <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:34:22 -0600

138 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:36:21 -0700

101 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:40:16 -0700

161 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:41:11 -0500

32 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:46:01 -0700

45 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Frank Ippolito <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:46:14 -0500

122 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:01:16 -0700

142 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:02:17 -0500

143 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:06:28 -0700

156 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:06:28 -0500

153 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Anne Runyon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:14:19 -0500

50 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:13:55 -0700

64 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:10:59 -0700

165 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:22:13 -0700

173 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Anne Runyon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:39:52 -0500

80 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:46:44 -0700

108 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Anne Runyon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:21:01 -0500

121 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:40:25 -0500

173 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:44:58 -0500

22 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Consie Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:06:54 -0500

51 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

The Schaudt's <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:55:15 -0600

44 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

The Schaudt's <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:58:04 -0600

69 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

wendy hiller gee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:23:14 -0800

53 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:25:55 -0500

56 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 06:53:06 -0500

60 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 08:01:51 -0500

50 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Consie Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:26:14 -0500

48 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Anne Runyon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:16:18 -0500

64 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Patty McGrane Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 08:15:10 -0800

85 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Consie Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:43:20 -0500

116 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:58:12 -0500

169 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Patty McGrane Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:21:06 -0800

182 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 12:37:08 -0500

203 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Consie Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:00:11 -0500

221 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Patty McGrane Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:52:29 -0800

236 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Frank Ippolito <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:10:03 -0500

1027 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Amelia Hansen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:52:42 -0500

290 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Gail Guth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:03:51 -0500

185 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Anne Runyon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:21:27 -0500

304 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Gail Guth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:26:37 -0500

296 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Phillip Vogel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:38:28 -0500

216 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Anne Runyon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:45:26 -0500

421 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Gail Guth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:52:34 -0500

400 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Consie Powell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:17:33 -0500

236 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Anne Runyon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:37:03 -0500

604 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Amelia Hansen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:00:49 -0500

290 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Amelia Hansen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:03:44 -0500

457 lines

Re: TAN: toxic balance

Gail Guth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:17:53 -0500

361 lines

New Thread

TAN: trip to Burma

TAN: trip to Burma

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Jan 2008 19:46:08 -0500

57 lines

New Thread

TAN: Yeah, pretty.

TAN: Yeah, pretty.

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2008 10:35:43 -0500

34 lines

Re: TAN: Yeah, pretty.

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:18:36 -0500

53 lines

Re: TAN: Yeah, pretty.

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2008 09:21:31 -0700

45 lines

Re: TAN: Yeah, pretty.

Anne_rr <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2008 12:16:25 -0500

133 lines

Re: TAN: Yeah, pretty.

Amelia <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2008 12:23:09 -0500

36 lines

Re: TAN: Yeah, pretty.

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2008 16:48:09 -0500

39 lines

Re: TAN: Yeah, pretty.

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2008 14:59:44 -0700

51 lines

Re: TAN: Yeah, pretty.

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2008 17:05:16 -0500

52 lines

Re: TAN: Yeah, pretty.

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2008 17:12:43 -0500

43 lines

Re: TAN: Yeah, pretty.

Amelia <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2008 17:17:03 -0500

27 lines

Re: TAN: Yeah, pretty.

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Jan 2008 15:18:43 -0700

55 lines

Re: TAN: Yeah, pretty.

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 08:11:44 -0500

28 lines

Re: TAN: Yeah, pretty.

Amelia <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 10:07:14 -0500

28 lines

Re: TAN: Yeah, pretty.

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Jan 2008 11:39:21 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

TAN:Re: [SCIART] Brush emergency

TAN:Re: [SCIART] Brush emergency

Gail Guth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:21:57 -0500

89 lines

Re: TAN:Re: [SCIART] Brush emergency

Geoff Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:19:23 +1100

97 lines

New Thread

Thank you!

Thank you!

margaretnelson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:29:30 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

totally tan

totally tan

Mieke Roth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:08:13 +0100

19 lines

Re: totally tan

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:37:26 -0500

63 lines

Re: totally tan

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:40:48 -0500

81 lines

Re: totally tan

Mieke Roth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:15:32 +0100

267 lines

Re: totally tan

Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:28:24 -0700

35 lines

New Thread

tree idenfication?

tree idenfication?

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:30:27 -0500

28 lines

Re: tree idenfication?

Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:05:58 -0600

41 lines

Re: tree idenfication?

The Schaudt's <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:57:28 -0600

52 lines

Re: tree idenfication?

duboisworks <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:35:18 -0500

43 lines

Re: tree idenfication?

Patty McGrane Harms <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:52:09 -0800

61 lines

New Thread

tree identification

tree identification

Joan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:59:18 -0500

15 lines

New Thread

watercolor paper, was Botanical Drawing

watercolor paper, was Botanical Drawing

The Schaudt's <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Jan 2008 08:16:22 -0600

107 lines

Re: watercolor paper, was Botanical Drawing

Barbara Harmon <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:30:01 -0500

177 lines

Re: watercolor paper, was Botanical Drawing

Bruce Bartrug <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Jan 2008 16:38:21 -0500

61 lines

New Thread

Who did this image?

Who did this image?

Katura Reynolds <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:17:16 -0500

177 lines

Re: Who did this image?

David W. Ehlert, MAMS, CMI <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:39:50 -0800

210 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.UNL.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager