Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:41:37 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hey Wen!
Staedtler pigment liners all the way.
My fav.
Best,
Dave
On Mar 25, 2010, at 2:26 PM, Wendy Beth Jackelow wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am working on a pen and ink project where I would normally take out my old rapidographs. Because
> I don't want the hassle of cleaning them (such laziness), I am now eyeing the unused Faber-Castell Pitt pens that are in my drawer.
> Do they work pretty much like a rapidograph (single line weight per pen) or do those kind of pens get mushed
> upon use? The ink seems as black as a rapidograph when I used it on the denril paper I usually use for pen
> and ink. Has anyone used them for pen and ink and what is your opinion of these "modern" pens versus the rapidographs.
> Is there a brand that most folks prefer?
>
> Thanks for any feedback or insight you might have. I think it was touched upon a little in the India ink posts, so I hope
> I am not being redundant!
>
> Take care,
> Wendy
>
> Wendy Beth Jackelow, MFA, CMI
> Medical & Scientific Illustration
>
> 266 Pelton Avenue
> Staten Island, NY 10310
> Tel/fax (718) 273-0002
> [log in to unmask]
> http://www.wbjackelowstudios.com
>
> Need to leave or subscribe to the Sciart-L listserv? Follow the instructions at
> http://citnews.unl.edu/presentmethods_lana/listserv/index.html
Need to leave or subscribe to the Sciart-L listserv? Follow the instructions at
http://citnews.unl.edu/presentmethods_lana/listserv/index.html
|
|
|