Mon, 8 Dec 2014 13:05:02 -0500
On 12/8/2014 12:51 PM, Jean Paul de Sens wrote:
> So, at best, only 1 in 4 people said "Put them in the Chivalry" ?
Yes. Because the pool of people who were asked kept shrinking,
let me lay it out that way.
23.0% f those that answered the survey at all.
24.9% of those that answered the peerage screening question
35.1% of those that said Yes to the peerage screening question
37.2% of those that answered the rapier-specific question
Compare that last number against the REPORTED figures:
37% said "In the Chivalry"
35% said "Within own Peerage"
20% said "Within shared Peerage"
Let's smack the report to the Board around a little bit.
According to the report found at:
"1. The respondents in general strongly support the idea of a new
martial peerage option (70% of SCA Inc. respondents, 71% of Paid members
and current participants, and 73% of people who have participated in the
past but don’t participate now). The support varies significantly by
Kingdom (ranging from 63% to 79%), and by the specific peerage option in
question, with only three of the specific options having even a
majority-level of support."
There is no kind way to say it: that's a big fat lie.
Manage your subscription at http://listserv.unl.edu.
listserv.unl.edu lists do not accept incoming email from Yahoo.com, AOL.com or Dropbox.com due to their DMARC policies.