SCIART-L Archives

SciArt-L Discussion List-for Natural Science Illustration-


Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
"Emily S. Damstra" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
SciArt-L Discussion List-for Natural Science Illustration- <[log in to unmask]>
Tue, 8 Feb 2011 10:05:57 -0500
text/plain (1165 bytes) , text/html (2047 bytes)
I think every scientist must have different criteria for deciding who will
be listed as a co-author. I have been offered to be listed as co-author in
return for creating an illustration for the paper. (I declined to do the
illustration, since a co-authorship isn't going to pay the bills). I suspect
that this was the scientist's way of dealing with inadequate funding, and I
don't blame him one bit for using the authorship as a form of payment, if
that's what it takes.
*Emily S. Damstra*
freelance science illustrator
Kitchener, Ontario
(519) 578-3871
[log in to unmask]

On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Raymond King <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I am a biologist and completely agree with Britt.  You would have to make
> some pretty significant contributions to the article in order to be listed
> as a co-author or contributor other than illustrator.  Scientists tend to be
> very, very territorial about their published research.  Might not be fair
> but that's the way it is.
> Ray

Need to leave or subscribe to the Sciart-L listserv? Follow the instructions at