SCIART-L Archives

SciArt-L Discussion List-for Natural Science Illustration-


Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Linda Feltner <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
SciArt-L Discussion List-for Natural Science Illustration- <[log in to unmask]>
Wed, 26 Dec 2012 14:35:30 -0700
text/plain (1272 bytes) , text/html (5 kB)
Hi Chris:
I am using an assortment of those brushes (pointed rounds 2,4,8), just finished a gouache project. I'm using the series 4050 . I looked at these for any long bristled flats, but they only make short stubby brights, which is not what I'm in need of.

I tried the Princetons, because they are easily available to my students. Gouache is harder on brushes, so I wanted to try these synthetics. They have some good qualities, and was happy with the work. Just ordered a 3/0 to go with the set for I had to sacrifice a w/c brush for the really small stuff. 

I don't like using the same brushes for gouache and transparent watercolor.

Happy Painting in the new year!

Linda M. Feltner Artist, LLC
P.O. Box 325
Hereford, AZ 85615
(520) 803-0538

On Dec 26, 2012, at 2:16 PM, [log in to unmask] wrote:

> It sounds crazy but -  Princeton Synthetic Sable brushes.  I use the watercolor rounds and am impressed with them.  They're an inexpensive brush which works very well, hold a lot of pigment and hold up.  heresy.
> Chris
> On Dec 26, 2012, at 2:31 PM, Linda Feltner wrote:

Need to leave or subscribe to the Sciart-L listserv? Follow the instructions at