SCIART-L Archives

SciArt-L Discussion List-for Natural Science Illustration-


Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Kathleen Garness <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
SciArt-L Discussion List-for Natural Science Illustration- <[log in to unmask]>
Fri, 4 Feb 2011 19:55:09 -0600
text/plain (32 lines)
Pam, you make a really wonderful point! : )


On Feb 4, 2011, at 6:25 PM, Pam Little wrote:

> Hi Jan,
> You denigrate yourself and your valuable (both in the sense of $  
> and educational content) contribution by saying you didn't provide  
> to the 'written portion' of this article. Nine times out of ten the  
> article would be much less educational without accompanying  
> illustrations to illuminate information in the text. The author  
> promised you credit as an author, and that's where your name should  
> be. I would not accept any feeble excuses.
> This is a continual struggle that all illustrators face. I can  
> cross post this to the AMI (Assn. of Med. Illustrators) list and  
> there are many there, along with those like Barry, who have fought  
> and won the recognition as co-author, and who might be able to  
> provide you with more insight on this problem.
> You risk more by not standing up for yourself than you do by  
> letting this slide -
> Pam

Need to leave or subscribe to the Sciart-L listserv? Follow the instructions at