Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 2 Feb 1998 17:16:39 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
John,
Thanks for the clarification. I appreciate it.
Karen Ackoff
Asst. Professor of Fine Arts
Indiana Univ. South Bend
[log in to unmask]
>>
>>In regard to #2. As an alternative to a graduate program in biological
>>illustration, you might wish to consider graduate programs in medical
>>illustration. While specialized toward medical art, as a 2nd-year student,
>>you general develop a thesis project in your area of interest. Depending on
>>the program you pick and the flexibility of that program, you could very
>>well do a thesis on a biological (rather than medical) topic. I did my
>>graduate thesis on the biomechanics of movement in horses. For programs,
>>contact the Assoc. of Medical Illustrators. In addition there is a graduate
>>program in Medical Illustration at the Rochester Institute of Technology.
>>It is not accredited by the Assoc. of Med. Illustrators, but it *is*
>>accredited - by the same boards that accredit most colleges and
>>universities.
>
>As a point of information I'd like to correct a bit of the above
>information. The accredited programs in medical and biological
>illustration are not accreditated by the Association of Medical
>Illustrators (AMI). Accreditation is by the Commission on Accreditation of
>Allied Health Education Programs (CAAHEP). CAAHEP is the largest allied
>health accreditation system in the nation and I believe they do the same
>for about 18 allied health professions. I've seen many fine illustrators
>come from the RIT program but RIT has never submitted their program for
>CAHEEP accredtiation.
>
>John Nyquist
Karen Ackoff
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|