> Lots of ways. My insurance rates and taxes go up, for one.
But you said it could injure or be lethal to you. Not that it would cost you money. The money part is a dangerous slope because LOTS of dumb things I, and millions of others may choose to do will do the exact same thing. In fact, SCA fighting could potentially do it. Heck, for my lady, walking can do it! lol
> But I fear I am in danger of falling for your attempted misdirection here.
> The issue under discussion was you not putting seatbelts on the minor
> children in your back seat.
Actually, my argument was on the whole seat belt law, not just the proposed ne addition.
> You have all kinds of Constitutional rights, you just have no
> Constitutional right to operate a motor vehicle on the public roadways.
Ok, but that's not what you originally said, you said "When you operate a vehicle on the public roads you have no rights." So now we agree that I DO still have rights. One of these is:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized
My stance is pulling me over for seatbelt violation (or something equally unharmful to anyone) is a violation of that right. I commited no crime. This law is simply a scam to get around the 4th ammendment and leavy an unreasonable tax.
In Service - Arthur Smith / Arthur of Ballan Moor
Calontir Gifts Store: www.cafepress.com/calontirgifts