Way back, someone in an authoritative position in the arts - whose
name I now forget - said to increase the price of one-time use by ten
for the price of a buyout (or work-for-hire). I tried this on occasion
and got laughed at. Realistically speaking, I think it should be
doubled at the very least. A higher price might not fly today in very
many markets. My 2 cents.
On Mar 11, 2014, at 12:49 PM, Karen Ackoff wrote:
> I know the ramifications of work-for-hire. What I was wondering is…
> is there a standard amount for which the price of a job is
> increased, if it is work-for-hire? Let's just say something was
> priced at $100. Would the price be doubled? tripled? This is not a
> popular-type of piece; it has a very specific use.
> Need to leave or subscribe to the Sciart-L listserv? Follow the
> instructions at
Need to leave or subscribe to the Sciart-L listserv? Follow the instructions at