I'll be interested to hear what others say about this, as I've had
similar problems with some older work I considered putting online. The
only way I resolved the issue was to do exactly what you have done:
use some rather complex masking to remove the area around the image
and fill it with white. That's because the paper I used is not 100%
white, and it also has texture that creates nuanced color. And I've
also found that my scanner, while very good, has subtle areas of light
and dark: the brightness over the bed isn't completely even. I
wouldn't have known this if I hadn't scanned a piece of white paper,
adjusted the levels to exaggerate lights and darks, and then looked at
the result.
As far as your images go, Bruce, I too cannot tell if I am seeing pure
white or whether there is a subtle tonality. Part of this is because
of the line rule around your images and I cannot compare the "whites"
side-by-side without the rule interfering visually. Also, I think the
low web resolution affects my perception too and I'd need to see a
higher res to be certain. I can imagine I am seeing what you are
seeing - some tints or subtle paper texture - but I simply am not
sure. All this said, I think what I see looks fine and if those
subtleties are there I think they are unimportant and not worth
worrying about. My 2 cents.
Lynette
--
Ms. Lynette R. Cook, Artist/Illustrator
[log in to unmask]
Main Web Site: http://www.lynettecook.com
On Mar 10, 2014, at 8:23 AM, Bruce Bartrug wrote:
> It can be quite difficult -- and/or quite tedious -- to get
> watercolor paper to look white on line. I'm building a new website
> and it's quite frustrating to have to complete an elaborate
> selection to get white backgrounds. Then, especially on scans,
> these sometimes still have a color cast when on the web. Or maybe
> I've just been staring at white on my monitor too long.
>
> Any suggestions to help with this frequent problem would be much
> appreciated. You can see the situation here: http://www.brucebartrug.com/new-page-1/
> . Click on the watercolor gallery (it's the only one populated
> with work currently.) You can see larger images by clicking on a
> thumbnail. Some of these look tinted and are from scans, so I'll
> try photos -- if I get a sunny day before June :). I swear the one
> of the blue-headed vireo should be white -- it took me 45 minutes to
> erase around the edges then clear the rest of the white background
> with selections. Still looks colored to me.
>
> Sigh. (Did I say that already?)
>
> Thanks in advance,
> B
>
> --
> Bruce Bartrug
> Nobleboro, Maine, USA
> [log in to unmask]
> www.brucebartrug.com
>
> The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil,
> but because of those who look on and do nothing. - Albert Einstein
Need to leave or subscribe to the Sciart-L listserv? Follow the instructions at
http://www.gnsi.org/resources/reviews/gnsi-sciart-l-listserv
|