If you use the phrase "patents of arms" to describes "letters patent",
and in particular those granting arms, they exist.
And the London Masters is the reason, disregarding any opinion I have on
the "4th peerage" in general, that I hate the proposed title.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014, at 01:34 PM, Mark Schuldenfrei wrote:
> On 12/4/2014 2:04 PM, Patricia Schmidt wrote:
> > Part of his early research (nearly
> > 20 years ago) was on finding mundane patents of arms that had been given
> > in the area of rapier combat.
> That would be fascinating.
> To my reasonably-good knowledge, there is no such thing (outside
> the SCA) as a Patent of Arms.
> There is no shortage of elevations to the nobility or bestowal
> of armorial bearings for all KINDS of stuff, toward the end of
> period, when the whole concept of feudalism was breaking down.
> Amusingly, the London Masters of Defense was not a chivalric
> order - it was a money-making machine that had a Royal
> monopoly. While newly installed members swore oaths to the
> London Masters of Defense, there was no feudalism involved,
> and not answering noble making reciprocal feudal promises
> in return.
> Manage your subscription at http://listserv.unl.edu.
> listserv.unl.edu lists do not accept incoming email from Yahoo.com,
> AOL.com or Dropbox.com due to their DMARC policies.
[log in to unmask]
"No matter how much you feed the wolf,
he keeps looking at the forest." --Ilse Lehiste
Manage your subscription at http://listserv.unl.edu.
listserv.unl.edu lists do not accept incoming email from Yahoo.com, AOL.com or Dropbox.com due to their DMARC policies.