I was even more radical, Elasait, said 'no' and then pointed a finger at the
only peerage not including non-rattan combatants...
From: Lis Schraer
> (Rumor has it that this is not a sure-thing, but that the Board
> is wavering. Even a short note which says YES or NO would be
> a good idea.)
> My LONG note to the Board was just sent. :-)
> Tibor (6 pages, but really only about 4 pages of content)
Just sent mine too, although it was short and sweet (3 paragraphs).
Summary: I'm extremely opposed to a 4th peerage for fencing only; if
they do one it needs to include archery and equestrian. To do otherwise
is a slap in the face to aficionados of those pursuits.
Manage your subscription at http://listserv.unl.edu.
listserv.unl.edu lists do not accept incoming email from Yahoo.com, AOL.com or Dropbox.com due to their DMARC policies.