Thank you, Britt.
It is quite challenging, and yes, in a system where the art is licensed by use, there will always be the possibility of people in this fairly well-connected community "sharing" previously paid for art. I like your idea of leasing to own eventually... though even that requires a budget, and if they can't secure funding, there's no way they'll ever be able to afford the full amount. However, if the project is staged over time, and the initial work is as well-received as we think it will be, perhaps there is more money out there that will appear when the work proves it's value.
In regards to the content - it's not ideas that are being illustrated, so much as observations. I don't believe there is anything proprietary at stake, and the art would be public access (and possible licensing) either way.
> On Feb 23, 2016, at 2:03 PM, Britt Griswold <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> That is a very interesting problem you have to consider.
> Researchers are notoriously short funded. So it is not surprising they want the world for very little money. You have to decide if this is a project that is worth your time and effort. Including the time and effort to set up and manage a sales system if you are going to try to extrace a fair value over time.
> First, do you trust them to remember to come buy the image from your site instead of just asking a colleague to borrow their copy that was bought, just for this powerpoint thing they need by tomorrow...
> Might you be bertter off getting them to leasing the whole collection for a yearly payment? (lease to own!). You want to minimize the hassle of this whole experience for yourself and for them. If they know they will get additional content over a several year peiod, they are then locked in to staying the course and feeling like they get more value for each yearly payment. And you get more time to fit in the project in your spare time when you are free of better paying work. If they can't pay reasonably up front, you trade for longer schedules and reasonable payment over several budget cycles. They can sell it to the administration like they justify software licence fees.
> If you were to set up a sales site, I am thinking something like Square Space with all the modules they offer might help minimize the hassle of setting up and maintaining something. But you are investing your time and money, it is not a free business model. And would you limit sales to just this group or are you now a free agent selling thier ideas to the world?
> Need to leave or subscribe to the Sciart-L listserv? Follow the instructions at
Need to leave or subscribe to the Sciart-L listserv? Follow the instructions at