LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCIART-L Archives


SCIART-L Archives

SCIART-L Archives


SCIART-L@LISTSERV.UNL.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCIART-L Home

SCIART-L Home

SCIART-L  February 1998

SCIART-L February 1998

Subject:

Re: TAN: Save The WWM!

From:

Cindy Shaw <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Thu, 5 Feb 1998 00:22:53 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (226 lines)

Emil Huston wrote:

>
> WARNING!
> The following quote should be read only by people who can imitate Emil's heavy
> East European accent (close enough to the East Indian one..)
>
> "There is more to life than increasing speed"
> Mohandas Gandhi


Hi Emil -

Glad to see you have more time on your hands these days (g). With that
in mind, I thought you might enjoy this exchange of listserv chitchat
from some colleagues across the drink.

WARNING:
The following should be read only by people who can imitate Monte Python
and Margaret Thatcher's heavy British accents.





.....................................

BRITISH CARTOGRAPHIC SOCIETY DESIGN GROUP. OCCASIONAL NOTES  1

>From time to time esoteric items are raised at our various meetings and
get-togethers that prompt correspondence and emails.  These are rarely
learned pontifications but more whatever came into some cartographers
mind whilst they were in the shower. However, these asides have often
led
to more formal research and design projects if we feel that the subject
needs further investigation.

Regards

Alan Collinson Design Group Co Convenor


NOTES ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND EXPERT SYSTEMS  (Correspondence)

As you know there is no such thing as an expert system, just as there
can
be no such thing as artificial intelligence. Electronic impulses can't
think. It was a philosopher called Sharp I believe, who invented the
paradigm 'Squiggle, Squiggle, Squoggle, Squoggle' What he meant was that
a computer is programmed to respond to commands and no more, it has no
understanding of what those commands mean. Even in those cases where it
is programmed to learn from itself. If it gets a command
squiggle-squiggle, its response is squoggle-squoggle, but it does not
know there is a difference between sqiggle and squoggle. There was a
little game I used to play to illustrate this.  A small chessboard with
four or five squares on each side was used by counters from opposing
sides. The object was to get your counter to the other end without being
stalled. Each counter could move in a number of directions at will, and
a
set of match boxes was used with the moves written inside. By one simple
device this 'computer can never be beaten. Of the moves possible at each
stage you take out the final move which lost so that it can never make
that move again. Bit by bit only winning combinations are left. The
computer has become 'intelligent', but if this is intelligence I'm a
squoggle.
However I am aware that greater minds than mine have come to the
opposite
conclusion.

.....................................


I was intrigued by your squiggles, one day you will have to show me your
chess game. By my reckoning the computer would eventually discount every
move and decide the only safe option was not to move at all. Much the
same as cartography has.

I smiled when I read that there can be no such thing as artificial
intelligence because electronic impulses can't think :-) On the
contrary,
thought is nothing more than electronic impulses, and all intelligence
is
naturally occurring and self propagating. Chew on that one.

.........................

When we were writing about artificial intelligence you said
"I smiled when I read that 'there can be no such thing as artificial
intelligence because electronic impulses can't think' . On the contrary,
thought is nothing more than electronic impulses, and all intelligence
is
naturally occuring and self propagating."

Come off it Sunshine! Whatever thought is, it is a gread deal MORE than
electronic impulses. There may be an arguement in favour of artificial
intelligence but this isn't it. And surely your second proposition 'that
it's all natural and self propagating' excludes any possibility of the
artificial. My opinion may be wrong but crap thinking like this will
never prove it.  (OOps! poke in the eye and knee in the goolies next
time
we meet?)

................

And now, Mr. Know-It-All, just who do you accuse of "crap thinking"??!!
Big Sigh.  I wonder if Einstein ever suffered the ignorance of fools.
;-)

 Read it again and think about it this time.  :-)

You said "there is no such thing as artificial intelligence because
electronic impulses can't think" and I replied that "thought is nothing
more than electronic impulses, and all intelligence is naturally
occurring
and self propagating."

I'm not sure I could make it any clearer.  What I was hoping to
illuminate
was the irony that the "artificial" intelligence of computers is not
artificial but is instead a natural product of human intelligence.

In the human brain one thought is followed by another thought, with the
connecting string being human experience.  That is why I think of Bram
Stoker when I see the OS crossed off your Christmas card list  (nice
touch,
by the way!).  The thing which separates human thought from computer
logic
is the ability for humans to have original thoughts by linking
previously
unrelated thoughts.  And more than that, the ability to recognise a
useful
thought from a nonsensical thought.  (...maybe I should stop now!)

The human existence is conditioned and moulded by cause and effect - an
easy enough concept for a computer to understand.  Computers can be
taught
to use their limited experiences to react in the most appropriate way to
unfamiliar circumstances.  So can you not imagine that in 30 years we
will
see the creation of computers with the capacity for real thought, not
just
artificial intelligence?  And perhaps, one day, computers with the
ability
to propagate original thoughts from those thoughts we implanted in them?

And as you found at your party, humans have the ability to build not
only
on their own experience, but also the experience of previous
generations.

Imagine how much more quickly a computer could learn with access to a
global database of human experience like the internet.

I have no doubt that you think original thought requires more than
electrical impulses?  Next I'll be trying to persuade you that the soul
is
nothing more than a chemical imbalance.  ;-)

It makes me want to go and read Douglas Adams.

.....................................


The connecting string between thoughts being human experience is also a
good way of putting it, but I am still unsure about your idea that the
thing which separates human thought from computer logic is the ability
to
link previously unrelated thoughts. For two reasons. Human experience is
not the same as linking previously unrelated thoughts, and, to my mind,
to jump from this to the assumption that when a computer is bringing
together unrelated things, it is having thoughts, is to move the
goalposts very decidedly in the computers favour.  It is not as though I
have a fear that computers will eventually surplant my feeble reasoning
capacity. I love these things that can do things I can't do, and can do
the things I can do a 1000 times the speed. But that is not the issue.
Computers will not, as you suggest, be able to propagate thoughts in
thirty years time from the thoughts we implanted in them because what we
inplanted were not thoughts.

Again you do the same thing with cause and effect. True this can easily
be juggled by a computer, but surely human experience is not conditioned
and moulded by merely this. My feeling is that there other factors which
mould us which relegate cause and effect to the sidelines.
If this is all human existence is then, to be sure, a computer can
handle
it after a fashion, (cause, an impulse; effect, a discharge) but in
order
to compare this with real human existence the goalposts have to be so
narrow that only an ant could squeeze through.

What about the Desire, the Will, what about fear, what about Love, what
about Bruce's spider.
And above all, what about haggis neaps and tatties for tea. I would do
anything for a plateful right now, not just because of what they taste
like but for the emotions and images they invoke in me. Once I have had
them I want to become world curling champion, throw the caber, walk the
Royal Mile and hold my kilt above my head. This is thinking, this is
human experience motivating future outcomes. This is the Bram Stoker
effect.

I gave my computer a haggis and it threw up!

As for the soul, lets not get into that one or we will be here for ever.
One thing I know above all else. Computers have no souls. Just at the
moment you say to yourself "Please don't crash now" They do.


..................................

THE END SO FAR

OVER TO YOU


...................................

Food for thought, hey?

Emil, do you know what "goolies", "tatties", and "haggis neaps" are?



Cheers,

Cindy

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.UNL.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager