On 12/8/2014 12:51 PM, Jean Paul de Sens wrote: > So, at best, only 1 in 4 people said "Put them in the Chivalry" ? Yes. Because the pool of people who were asked kept shrinking, let me lay it out that way. 23.0% f those that answered the survey at all. 24.9% of those that answered the peerage screening question 35.1% of those that said Yes to the peerage screening question 37.2% of those that answered the rapier-specific question Compare that last number against the REPORTED figures: 37% said "In the Chivalry" 35% said "Within own Peerage" 20% said "Within shared Peerage" Let's smack the report to the Board around a little bit. According to the report found at: http://sca.org/scacensus2010/PeerageOptionsFindings.doc "1. The respondents in general strongly support the idea of a new martial peerage option (70% of SCA Inc. respondents, 71% of Paid members and current participants, and 73% of people who have participated in the past but don’t participate now). The support varies significantly by Kingdom (ranging from 63% to 79%), and by the specific peerage option in question, with only three of the specific options having even a majority-level of support." There is no kind way to say it: that's a big fat lie. Tibor -- Manage your subscription at http://listserv.unl.edu. listserv.unl.edu lists do not accept incoming email from Yahoo.com, AOL.com or Dropbox.com due to their DMARC policies.