On 5/21/2015 11:41 AM, Clayton Neff wrote:
> Yeah, having that resource removed from use makes things better.

Better for some, worse for others.

Certainly the authors of the songs deserve more credit than they
were getting. The optimal solution would have been to add credit,
rather than remove the resource.  But we can't make people do
more work, and the site owner opted for less work.  Ce la vie.

I have no skin in the game, having no ability to create
good songs [1], but I can understand Mathurin's concern
(and others) that their work was being essentially stolen
when they stopped receiving credit for the work.

Bards Dig Word Fame.


[1] I've done some lyrical substitution for a few songs for
     another hobby, but none for the SCA.  It's a newly
     discovered skill/talent for me.

Manage your subscription at  http://listserv.unl.edu.
listserv.unl.edu lists do not accept incoming email from Yahoo.com, AOL.com or Dropbox.com due to their DMARC policies.