Dear Amelia, Cindy and others: Your discussions about co-ops really took me back to long ago and far away in Madison with the co-op movement. There used to be co-ops in Madison for everything and some of the businesses there started out that way, as well as the co-op stores that are still there. There used to be a co-op organization in town that most of the co-ops were registered with and if I remember correctly they kept information on which co-ops made it and which didn't and what sort of problems they had. Though some of the problems you've both mentioned are specific to publishing, most of them are part of human nature and have been part of every group of people who tried to work together in this way. Perhaps they are still in Madison and could give some good information on these matters. My own experience with both successful and unsuccessful efforts of this type is that someone has to be designated and rewarded to take responsibility for these things to hold together over time, though some co-ops lose some of their best qualities when a paid staff starts to think of it as their co-op and the membership as clients, charges and pawns instead of full participants. It is important to keep that option open to members who can bring in new cycles of energy without the whole thing falling apart if they can't do it all the time. Also, there has to be a way to limit damage from people who are either not too serious, not too competent or are looking for a free ride on other people's effort. Another very important aspect is total honesty with all members, nothing kills a group faster than to have some information appear that was originally withheld from them "for the sake of the organization", even if it turns out that silence does avoid problems for awhile. Co-ops are wonderful when they work well and terrible when they don't. This could be a great idea. I'm glad there is conversation on self-publishing generally, I have hope of marketing some materials also. Miriam