>Ok, so we've talked about Universities- There are technical colleges for >science illustrations? You mean like Heald College? Or like Art Academy >type schools? Sorry, I didn't have time to study the surveys in any depth...... For instance, I didn't follow up on exactly what institutions were surveyed, were the surveys voluntary (with room for slight exaggeration : ), were the job descriptions on the surveys highly specific or sloppily generalized.....and on and on. I didn't sign on with any of the survey sites that required fees, but I am hoping they adhere to more rigorous surveying standands than the average web site fare. One other thing that stood out was a tendency for those artists who pursued higher degrees to actually be *working* in a artistic field of some sort. Seems that a large number of Fine Art graduates were working in entirely unrelated fields.....(maybe that was only temporary). I wish I had bookmarked these sites so I could pass them on to interested parties. I tried search headings such as "Illustrator wages" and "artist salaries" "artist pay scales"....... Computer science related jobs pay uniformly high rates......entry levels starting around 35k-55k. 60-80k was the midrange *norm* for programmers. THe higher the level of proficiency needed for the job, the higher the pay........Until you get to *artists* who also demonstrate a high level of technical proficiency, resourcefulness and problem-solving capacity......There has been almost zero recognition/recompension here. I imagine because there are so few of us in comparison with the hoardes of programmers. Britt, if you decide to head off on your own after amassing experience running a web site, the lowest income level was 90K....!!! (90-150K +.) Artists will have to work this out on a solo basis........I recently took my supervisor (pleasantly) to task re what we could do to catch my pay rate up to modern standards. It seems there was a great deal we can do, but nobody had ever asked and there is only one of me here........So, a 'desk audit' has been requested which will survey my 'peers' in industry. I had the opportunity to completely rewrite/upgrade my job description which was was *pre-computer*!!! I think men may get paid more because they are more perenially *vigilant* about making sure their pay matches the effort expended. I, on the other hand, had rarely even thought about it........and paid the price. My supervisor didn't even have a basic working understanding of what it takes to do my job...I didn't get mad, I got busy looking for ways to help her with this as I had never realized the depth of non-comprehension on the upperlings' part. When she became my boss 3 years back and told me not to bother with monthly reports to 'save time and paper' I never dreamed that this would cost *me* down the road. But the bosses can't know what is going on without pertinent info and so I am reinstating the montly report. This is an area where my male peers would have been more vigilant all along I believe....I was churning out the work, focusing intently on my scientist customers..making sure they were taken care of and assuming my bosses were taking care of me.....Only, they weren't. Good lesson. Good wakeup call!! I take complete responsibility for working this out. And my boss is working on it too.......once she was made aware. Interestingly, while I was doing my own survey searches I got a call from the supervisor of an illustrator peer who was doing surveys of her own in hopes of upgrading that artist's pay grade. I was so pleased to be able to help out. Synchronicity!! I like that!! Jaynie