>What you should be graded on is the quality of your piece, not the 
construction of supporting evidence. If I
 >can look at your documentation, identify  a) what your project is, b) 
a time and place of origin, and c) some
 >understanding of why it was constructed in a particular manner, your 
documentation was successful. If that
 >means you footnote your text and place all your plates at the end, 
there is historical precedence for that in
 >publication as well.
What he should be graded on _includes_ construction of supporting 
evidence. Lousy evidence
from non-authoritative writers will make for lousy documentation and 
lousy entries.

Information is important to readers, and so is knowing where the 
information came from.

 >This is Queen's Prize, not your PhD defense. The goal is to be 
involved, and inspire others to play with you,
 >not intimidate them out of the field. Save that for the Tri-levels.
He's not asking for MLA standards for bibliographies; he's wanting to 
know what to do with
some photographs he wants to properly credit, that's all.


Manage your subscription at lists do not accept incoming email from, or due to thier DMARC policies.