 |
 |
>What you should be graded on is the quality of your piece, not the construction of supporting evidence. If I >can look at your documentation, identify a) what your project is, b) a time and place of origin, and c) some >understanding of why it was constructed in a particular manner, your documentation was successful. If that >means you footnote your text and place all your plates at the end, there is historical precedence for that in >publication as well. What he should be graded on _includes_ construction of supporting evidence. Lousy evidence from non-authoritative writers will make for lousy documentation and lousy entries. Information is important to readers, and so is knowing where the information came from. >This is Queen's Prize, not your PhD defense. The goal is to be involved, and inspire others to play with you, >not intimidate them out of the field. Save that for the Tri-levels. He's not asking for MLA standards for bibliographies; he's wanting to know what to do with some photographs he wants to properly credit, that's all. Alban -- Manage your subscription at http://listserv.unl.edu. listserv.unl.edu lists do not accept incoming email from Yahoo.com, AOL.com or Dropbox.com due to thier DMARC policies.