-- Manage your subscription at http://listserv.unl.edu. listserv.unl.edu lists do not accept incoming email from Yahoo.com, AOL.com or Dropbox.com due to their DMARC policies.
So I never ever comment on these things... this one and only time I can't help myself. If everyone is really entitled to their opinions on this list lets see what happens. These are just random things I've been saying in my head whilst reading this thread today and are not, in any way, meant to offend anyone.
I'm sorry but SCA armored combat is not on the same historical accuracy plane as other medieval re-enactment groups. In fact, stick tag and kidney belts are quite a joke to other groups. Not necessarily defending that opinion.... just mentioning it. However I feel that other re-enactment groups put in just as much passion, dedication, skill, and historical accuracy.
Earning a peerage for service is also not the same thing as armored combat, yet we have a peerage for service.
How long has archery been around in the SCA? And how long does it take to the "earn the right" to have it's own peerage? I understand where Stefan is coming from. These activities have been ignored for a very long time. Sometimes you have to kick start change and let it snow ball... peerage for cut and thrust... ok, next is a peerage for archery/missile weapons.
Cut and thrust possesses just as much potential for technical skill, legitimate historical accuracy, and work as heavy combat does. (not that it really matters but, I've done both)
There are a number of people on this thread that speak of ignoring other groups... well it seems to me that people will be ignored which ever way this proposal swings.
As far as "earning the right".... just because something came along first does not, in any way, mean it automatically has a "right". Nor does that mean it has the right to judge whether others have that same right.
Calontir is so reluctant to change. No offense but, I believe that one day this will be it's undoing. You can't play like it's 1986 anymore (recruitment numbers have kinda proved that). Change happens and sometimes when you look at the bigger picture, it's for the better. Just because we re-enact the past does not mean we can't take steps foward to better this kingdom's future.
Judging by the number of one sided posts, mostly made by those who have either been in the SCA a long time or are/were peers themselves, people sound threatened by this change. It looks like some seem to feel that their worth in this kingdom will be diminished by adding a peerage.
I don't see anything wrong with archery, equestrian, and cut and thrust having peerage... you want to compartmentalize people? ok.. do it right. I feel there's nothing wrong with everyone getting in on this pie. Or just have one peerage that covers everything. Frankly there's already quite a lot of disorganization and it's not about to clear itself up anytime soon.
I, and others I know, find that this SCA-bureaucratic-I-want-to-put-everyone-in-their-place and this-is-the-way-its-always-been mentalities are black cancers spreading throughout this kingdom and organization. It has driven away many great people, who did and could have further contributed great things to this organization. I find that to be more detrimental to this kingdom than 100 peerages.
This is a hobby folks, something everyone is supposed to have fun with.... remember.
On Dec 4, 2014 5:26 PM, "Rex Deaver" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:-- Manage your subscription at http://listserv.unl.edu. listserv.unl.edu lists do not accept incoming email from Yahoo.com, AOL.com or Dropbox.com due to their DMARC policies.