I was even more radical, Elasait, said 'no' and then pointed a finger at the only peerage not including non-rattan combatants... Bess -----Original Message----- From: Lis Schraer > (Rumor has it that this is not a sure-thing, but that the Board > is wavering. Even a short note which says YES or NO would be > a good idea.) > > My LONG note to the Board was just sent. :-) > > Tibor (6 pages, but really only about 4 pages of content) > Just sent mine too, although it was short and sweet (3 paragraphs). Summary: I'm extremely opposed to a 4th peerage for fencing only; if they do one it needs to include archery and equestrian. To do otherwise is a slap in the face to aficionados of those pursuits. Elasait -- Manage your subscription at http://listserv.unl.edu. listserv.unl.edu lists do not accept incoming email from Yahoo.com, AOL.com or Dropbox.com due to their DMARC policies.