Print

Print


I was even more radical, Elasait, said 'no' and then pointed a finger at the 
only peerage not including non-rattan combatants...

Bess

-----Original Message----- 
From: Lis Schraer
> (Rumor has it that this is not a sure-thing, but that the Board
> is wavering.  Even a short note which says YES or NO would be
> a good idea.)
>
> My LONG note to the Board was just sent. :-)
>
>     Tibor (6 pages, but really only about 4 pages of content)
>
Just sent mine too, although it was short and sweet (3 paragraphs).
Summary:  I'm extremely opposed to a 4th peerage for fencing only; if
they do one it needs to include archery and equestrian.  To do otherwise
is a slap in the face to aficionados of those pursuits.

Elasait

--
Manage your subscription at  http://listserv.unl.edu.
listserv.unl.edu lists do not accept incoming email from Yahoo.com, AOL.com or Dropbox.com due to their DMARC policies.