Thank you, all.

   Sorry I dropped the ball there for a few days. I received several
interesting off-line answers in addition.

   I think I should also try to clarify. First off, for the (some)
botanists - in entomology there is much less of a tradition of "creating
duplicates" (of purportedly the same individual..thinking about branches of
an oak tree here). Insect specimens overwhelmingly remain and travel
"entire" (even following dissection). I hope that distinction is fair
enough to most.

   Here is the conflict, as simple as I can state it. There is an
institution that the specimens ultimately belong to, and that loans them
out to a researcher. Then there is a researcher, not affiliated with the
institution, who right now has resources and arguably needs to "publish"
the specimens via iDigBio, GBIF, etc. (as well as other outlets such as a
research journal).

   Let's assume that the owning institution just really does not have the
resources right now. Not even to put a locally unique specimen identifier
on it (or, it does that, but there is no digital counterpart). And the
researcher does. Beyond writing a kind, explanatory e-mail, and figuring
things out (idiosyncratically), is there some more widespread accepted
practice for resolving this conflict? Answering "I use this or that portal
that I happen to have access to and which does it for me", is not really a
generally applicable answer, right?

   If not, should we as a community (in our most hopeful moments, anyway)
consider creating one or more that are very open for contributions?
Something like an open portal for digitizing and iDigBio-/GBIF-publishing
research-relevant specimens of/for owner institutions that "just can't
right now, sorry".



On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Gil Nelson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi, Nico
> I am not exactly sure what you are looking for, but here is a link to a
> set of community generated workflows for several disciplines.
> Are you looking for entomology workflows? If so, what groups in
> particular? Katja Seltmann would also be a good resource for this.
> Best,
> Gil
> On 9/5/2016 1:56 PM, Nico Franz wrote:
>> Hi all:
>>    Is there a good reference (publication) I'm not aware of that guides
>> one towards best practices for digitizing and iDigBio-/GBIF-publishing
>> specimens from another source collection which has not yet done so, for the
>> purpose of a revisionary project?
>> Best, Nico
> --
> Gil Nelson, PhD
> Assistant Professor/Research
> iDigBio Steering Committee
> Integrated Digitized Biocollections
> Institute for Digital Information and Scientific Communication
> College of Communication and Information
> Courtesy Professor
> Department of Biological Sciences
> Robert K. Godfrey Herbarium
> Florida State University
> [log in to unmask]