Print

Print


On 7/5/17 4:17 PM, Michael A. Ivie wrote:
>
> Therefore, all specimens included by the author in the description, 
> and not excluded by the author, are the type series.
>
Post-1999, yes.
>
>   All specimens listed as being used to characterize the species are, 
> as a body, the type series
>
As long as they are listed explicitly, and treated as part of the type 
series. If, for example, the OD only says "Paratypes: 30 females, 20 
males, 20 larvae, various dates and localities" then none of these are 
actually paratypes, because there are no dates or localities or other 
identifying information given.
>
> The idea that a reviewer would say "paratypes are only the adults, 
> larvae should not be paratypes" is not correct, correct?
>
That is the reviewer's personal opinion, not anything in the Code.

Peace,

-- 
Doug Yanega      Dept. of Entomology       Entomology Research Museum
Univ. of California, Riverside, CA 92521-0314     skype: dyanega
phone: (951) 827-4315 (disclaimer: opinions are mine, not UCR's)
              http://cache.ucr.edu/~heraty/yanega.html
   "There are some enterprises in which a careful disorderliness
         is the true method" - Herman Melville, Moby Dick, Chap. 82