Unfortunately yes, I heard about this through my work at Annual Reviews, a nonprofit scientific publisher. For a long time we have relied upon a handful of freelance science illustrators to help us with overflow figures or busy times of the year. But since this law passed, we are no longer hiring independent freelancers because essentially they are doing the same work we do in-house (minus author correspondence). Instead, when we need overflow help, we must hire a temp illustrator or two. I think the difference is the temp illustrator is treated as a part-time employee with benefits.
I don’t know the whole story, but I think the intention of this law was to protect contractors from those shady employers who tried to hire freelancers for lower pay and no benefits.
However I can see how this may make it harder for some creative types to find freelance work (without having to apply for a part-time or temp position first)!
Has anyone else been directly impacted by this California law?
Apparently (according to this article), certain “creative” types such as artists are exempt from this. but it definitely bears watching. Thanks for bringing this to our attention!
Sent from my iPad
On Aug 20, 2019, at 7:27 PM, Catherine Wilson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
I heard a disturbing news. A court ruling in California know informally as Dynamex, may tighten the laws around independent contractors, the problem for freelancers: someone is an independent contractor only if they perform work “outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business.” Has anyone else heard of this?
Here is a journal article about it.
At your service,
Need to leave or subscribe to the Sciart-L listserv? Follow the instructions at
https://www.gnsi.org/listservList name is Sciart-L
Problems: Email Lana Johnson at [log in to unmask]