A number of years ago there was a move for all holders of private collections to “register” their collections with an institution.  This was done to ensure that private collections, upon the death of the owner, would not fall through the cracks and be lost.  Perhaps this idea needs to be resurrected?

Recently the Elbert Sleeper private weevil collection (including types), not previously accessible to anyone, was donated to the California Academy of Sciences.  Chris Grinter, collection manager for the CAS, will have more details, but it’s my understanding that this donation was delayed for sufficient time for dermestid damage to have taken place such that many of the larger specimens were destroyed. The donation may also have come very close to not happening at all with the family unsure what to do with it for some time prior to the donation. This is the fate risked when advance plans are not made for private collections to pass to a public institution upon death of the owner.  

I edit for Zootaxa and deal with all type depositions on a case by case basis. I encourage deposition in a public institution but if an author makes a strong case for a private institution I will accept that.

One argument I heard that I do not like is that many people pursue taxonomy as a hobby and do not get paid for it.  They spend much money on building, curating and storing a personal collection and that the one way such an individual can get reimbursed for this investment is to sell their collection. And since collections with more types sell for more money there is a reason to house types in their private collections.  Such is textbook conflict of interest as a taxonomist can oversplit in order to get more types thus increasing the value of their collection.  

Cheers, Bob
From: Entomological Collections Network Listserve <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Max Barclay <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: January 3, 2020 9:22:52 PM
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: vouchering query: Types deposited in private collections
I have to say as an editor and a collection manager, that I don't agree with the comment one person made that journals should 'require' (rather than 'recommend' like the ICZN Code does) that Types be deposited in an institution. This relies on an ideal-world belief that 'all institutions' are better managed and more accessible than 'all private collections' - and this is simply (sadly) not true. Some institutes have a near-total embargo on loaning types and are totally 'inaccessible to all science' unless you can afford to show up at the door - while some private collectors make their material very available. Think of Charlie and Lois O'Brien's private collection during their heyday, compared to certain major type-holding museums- and which you would rather consult a specimen from...?

I am editor in a journal that has a written policy against type deposition in private collections, and we lost a very good paper recently because a German expert did not want to deposit a unique holotype specimen away from his reference collection, because he was continuing to work on the group and did not want his own access to the taxon he described to be curtailed in future- his collection will pass to a major museum on his death, like Charlie's did, and he attends many international meetings, so the accessibility of the type (which was of course published in a different journal) is as good as most museums and better than some- so the only consequence of the 'rule' was that one journal shot itself in the foot and lost a good paper and some goodwill!

The life-span of a private collector is of course a tiny proportion of the life-span of a specimen, and most sensible collectors make arrangements for their collection to pass to what they judge to be a good institution, so in the end it is all the same. Of course many private individuals prefer to deposit their holotypes right away, and that is good (we gratefully received several at NHM this year, and they are well cared for and accessible) but it shouldn't be because a journal demands it. 


Saving the World with Evidence, Knowledge and Inspiration. (click to learn more)
Sauver le monde avec des preuves, des connaissances et de l'inspiration. (cliquez pour en savoir plus)

cmn2019-10-04 to March 29, 2019.