Hi Christy,We don't have a "verbatim collector" field in MCZBase. We attach the collector name to the specimen that best fits the specimen label, unless there is some ambiguity.If the label says "J. Smith" I will attach a person [agent] called "J. Smith", unless there's come context that says otherwise.If it just says "Smith" we attach a person [agent] called "Smith", unless there's come context that says otherwise.If it says "M. Thayer" [sorry, Margaret!] we'll attach the person [agent] "Margaret Thayer" since that's a distinct enough name.One can add taxonomic or institutional knowledge to help guide, but when in doubt, I would go with a more general person [agent]This is a case for having either a "verbatim label" field for the specimen, or label images attached to the record that serve as a voucher in cases of interpretation.Hope that makes sense!CrystalOn Wed, May 6, 2020 at 6:06 PM Christy Bills <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
When you are databasing specimens, if the label has a collector's initials, or some other shortened version of their name, but you know who it is, do you transcribe into the database who you are 99% sure the collector is or do you faithfully record the label data exactly as is?
We are using Symbiota/SCAN and I don't see a field where it would be appropriate to make a notation that we made that assumption (like "verbatim collector data").
Is this just me? tbh, I'm finding it difficult to concentrate since this has all gone down!
Happy to get replies just to me so we don't clutter this list.
Invertebrate Collections Manager
Natural History Museum of Utah
301 Wakara Way
Salt Lake City, Utah 84108